1.1 --- a/core.sql	Wed Mar 26 20:08:50 2014 +0100
     1.2 +++ b/core.sql	Sat Apr 05 23:04:43 2014 +0200
     1.3 @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@
     1.4          "indirect_majority_strict"      BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT TRUE,
     1.5          "indirect_majority_positive"    INT4    NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
     1.6          "indirect_majority_non_negative" INT4   NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
     1.7 -        "no_reverse_beat_path"          BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT TRUE,
     1.8 +        "no_reverse_beat_path"          BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT FALSE,
     1.9          "no_multistage_majority"        BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT FALSE,
    1.10          CONSTRAINT "timing" CHECK (
    1.11            ( "polling" = FALSE AND
    1.12 @@ -413,8 +413,8 @@
    1.13  COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."indirect_majority_strict"       IS 'If TRUE, then the indirect majority must be strictly greater than "indirect_majority_num"/"indirect_majority_den", otherwise it may also be equal.';
    1.14  COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."indirect_majority_positive"     IS 'Absolute number of votes in favor of the winner neccessary in a beat path to the status quo for an initaitive to be attainable as winner';
    1.15  COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."indirect_majority_non_negative" IS 'Absolute number of sum of votes in favor and abstentions in a beat path to the status quo for an initiative to be attainable as winner';
    1.16 -COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."no_reverse_beat_path"  IS 'Causes initiatives with "reverse_beat_path" flag to not be "eligible", thus disallowing them to be winner. See comment on column "initiative"."reverse_beat_path". This option ensures both that a winning initiative is never tied in a (weak) condorcet paradox with the status quo and a winning initiative always beats the status quo directly with a simple majority.';
    1.17 -COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."no_multistage_majority" IS 'Causes initiatives with "multistage_majority" flag to not be "eligible", thus disallowing them to be winner. See comment on column "initiative"."multistage_majority". This disqualifies initiatives which could cause an instable result. An instable result in this meaning is a result such that repeating the ballot with same preferences but with the winner of the first ballot as status quo would lead to a different winner in the second ballot. If there are no direct majorities required for the winner, or if in direct comparison only simple majorities are required and "no_reverse_beat_path" is true, then results are always stable and this flag does not have any effect on the winner (but still affects the "eligible" flag of an "initiative").';
    1.18 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."no_reverse_beat_path" IS 'EXPERIMENTAL FEATURE: Causes initiatives with "reverse_beat_path" flag to not be "eligible", thus disallowing them to be winner. See comment on column "initiative"."reverse_beat_path". This option ensures both that a winning initiative is never tied in a (weak) condorcet paradox with the status quo and a winning initiative always beats the status quo directly with a simple majority.';
    1.19 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."no_multistage_majority" IS 'EXPERIMENTAL FEATURE: Causes initiatives with "multistage_majority" flag to not be "eligible", thus disallowing them to be winner. See comment on column "initiative"."multistage_majority". This disqualifies initiatives which could cause an instable result. An instable result in this meaning is a result such that repeating the ballot with same preferences but with the winner of the first ballot as status quo would lead to a different winner in the second ballot. If there are no direct majorities required for the winner, or if in direct comparison only simple majorities are required and "no_reverse_beat_path" is true, then results are always stable and this flag does not have any effect on the winner (but still affects the "eligible" flag of an "initiative").';
    1.20  
    1.21  
    1.22  CREATE TABLE "unit" (