liquid_feedback_core
changeset 177:9975ce3f20ee
First version of update script from v1.4.0 to v1.5.0
| author | jbe |
|---|---|
| date | Wed Jun 08 17:31:00 2011 +0200 (2011-06-08) |
| parents | b2d87fbb123b |
| children | 184b023a5b1d |
| files | update/core-update.v1.4.0-v1.5.0.sql |
line diff
1.1 --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 1.2 +++ b/update/core-update.v1.4.0-v1.5.0.sql Wed Jun 08 17:31:00 2011 +0200 1.3 @@ -0,0 +1,1044 @@ 1.4 +BEGIN; 1.5 + 1.6 +CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW "liquid_feedback_version" AS 1.7 + SELECT * FROM (VALUES ('1.5.0_devel', 1, 5, -1)) 1.8 + AS "subquery"("string", "major", "minor", "revision"); 1.9 + 1.10 +ALTER TABLE "member" ADD COLUMN "formatting_engine" TEXT; 1.11 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "member"."formatting_engine" IS 'Allows different formatting engines (i.e. wiki formats) to be used for "member"."statement"'; 1.12 + 1.13 +CREATE TABLE "rendered_member_statement" ( 1.14 + PRIMARY KEY ("member_id", "format"), 1.15 + "member_id" INT8 REFERENCES "member" ("id") ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE, 1.16 + "format" TEXT, 1.17 + "content" TEXT NOT NULL ); 1.18 + 1.19 +COMMENT ON TABLE "rendered_member_statement" IS 'This table may be used by frontends to cache "rendered" member statements (e.g. HTML output generated from wiki text)'; 1.20 + 1.21 +ALTER TABLE "policy" ADD COLUMN "direct_majority_num" INT4 NOT NULL DEFAULT 1; 1.22 +ALTER TABLE "policy" ADD COLUMN "direct_majority_den" INT4 NOT NULL DEFAULT 2; 1.23 +ALTER TABLE "policy" ADD COLUMN "direct_majority_strict" BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT TRUE; 1.24 +ALTER TABLE "policy" ADD COLUMN "direct_majority_positive" INT4 NOT NULL DEFAULT 0; 1.25 +ALTER TABLE "policy" ADD COLUMN "direct_majority_non_negative" INT4 NOT NULL DEFAULT 0; 1.26 +ALTER TABLE "policy" ADD COLUMN "indirect_majority_num" INT4 NOT NULL DEFAULT 1; 1.27 +ALTER TABLE "policy" ADD COLUMN "indirect_majority_den" INT4 NOT NULL DEFAULT 2; 1.28 +ALTER TABLE "policy" ADD COLUMN "indirect_majority_strict" BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT TRUE; 1.29 +ALTER TABLE "policy" ADD COLUMN "indirect_majority_positive" INT4 NOT NULL DEFAULT 0; 1.30 +ALTER TABLE "policy" ADD COLUMN "indirect_majority_non_negative" INT4 NOT NULL DEFAULT 0; 1.31 +ALTER TABLE "policy" ADD COLUMN "no_reverse_beat_path" BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT TRUE; 1.32 +ALTER TABLE "policy" ADD COLUMN "no_multistage_majority" BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT FALSE; 1.33 + 1.34 +UPDATE "policy" SET 1.35 + "direct_majority_num" = "majority_num", 1.36 + "direct_majority_den" = "majority_den", 1.37 + "direct_majority_strict" = "majority_strict", 1.38 + "indirect_majority_num" = "majority_num", 1.39 + "indirect_majority_den" = "majority_den", 1.40 + "indirect_majority_strict" = "majority_strict"; 1.41 + 1.42 +ALTER TABLE "policy" DROP COLUMN "majority_num"; 1.43 +ALTER TABLE "policy" DROP COLUMN "majority_den"; 1.44 +ALTER TABLE "policy" DROP COLUMN "majority_strict"; 1.45 + 1.46 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."direct_majority_num" IS 'Numerator of fraction of neccessary direct majority for initiatives to be attainable as winner'; 1.47 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."direct_majority_den" IS 'Denominator of fraction of neccessary direct majority for initaitives to be attainable as winner'; 1.48 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."direct_majority_strict" IS 'If TRUE, then the direct majority must be strictly greater than "direct_majority_num"/"direct_majority_den", otherwise it may also be equal.'; 1.49 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."direct_majority_positive" IS 'Absolute number of "positive_votes" neccessary for an initiative to be attainable as winner'; 1.50 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."direct_majority_non_negative" IS 'Absolute number of sum of "positive_votes" and abstentions neccessary for an initiative to be attainable as winner'; 1.51 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."indirect_majority_num" IS 'Numerator of fraction of neccessary indirect majority (through beat path) for initiatives to be attainable as winner'; 1.52 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."indirect_majority_den" IS 'Denominator of fraction of neccessary indirect majority (through beat path) for initiatives to be attainable as winner'; 1.53 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."indirect_majority_strict" IS 'If TRUE, then the indirect majority must be strictly greater than "indirect_majority_num"/"indirect_majority_den", otherwise it may also be equal.'; 1.54 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."indirect_majority_positive" IS 'Absolute number of votes in favor of the winner neccessary in a beat path to the status quo for an initaitive to be attainable as winner'; 1.55 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."indirect_majority_non_negative" IS 'Absolute number of sum of votes in favor and abstentions in a beat path to the status quo for an initiative to be attainable as winner'; 1.56 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."no_reverse_beat_path" IS 'Causes initiatives with "reverse_beat_path" flag to not be "eligible", thus disallowing them to be winner. See comment on column "initiative"."reverse_beat_path". This option ensures both that a winning initiative is never tied in a (weak) condorcet paradox with the status quo and a winning initiative always beats the status quo directly with a simple majority.'; 1.57 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "policy"."no_multistage_majority" IS 'Causes initiatives with "multistage_majority" flag to not be "eligible", thus disallowing them to be winner. See comment on column "initiative"."multistage_majority". This disqualifies initiatives which could cause an instable result. An instable result in this meaning is a result such that repeating the ballot with same preferences but with the winner of the first ballot as status quo would lead to a different winner in the second ballot. If there are no direct majorities required for the winner, or if in direct comparison only simple majorities are required and "no_reverse_beat_path" is true, then results are always stable and this flag does not have any effect on the winner (but still affects the "eligible" flag of an "initiative").'; 1.58 + 1.59 +ALTER TABLE "area" DROP COLUMN "autoreject_weight"; 1.60 + 1.61 +DROP VIEW "open_issue"; 1.62 +DROP VIEW "issue_with_ranks_missing"; 1.63 + 1.64 +ALTER TABLE "issue" DROP COLUMN "vote_now"; 1.65 +ALTER TABLE "issue" DROP COLUMN "vote_later"; 1.66 +ALTER TABLE "issue" ADD COLUMN "status_quo_schulze_rank" INT4; 1.67 + 1.68 +CREATE VIEW "open_issue" AS 1.69 + SELECT * FROM "issue" WHERE "closed" ISNULL; 1.70 + 1.71 +COMMENT ON VIEW "open_issue" IS 'All open issues'; 1.72 + 1.73 +CREATE VIEW "issue_with_ranks_missing" AS 1.74 + SELECT * FROM "issue" 1.75 + WHERE "fully_frozen" NOTNULL 1.76 + AND "closed" NOTNULL 1.77 + AND "ranks_available" = FALSE; 1.78 + 1.79 +COMMENT ON VIEW "issue_with_ranks_missing" IS 'Issues where voting was finished, but no ranks have been calculated yet'; 1.80 + 1.81 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "issue"."half_frozen" IS 'Point in time, when "discussion_time" has elapsed; Frontends must ensure that for half_frozen issues a) initiatives are not revoked, b) no new drafts are created, c) no initiators are added or removed.'; 1.82 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "issue"."snapshot" IS 'Point in time, when snapshot tables have been updated and "population" and *_count values were precalculated'; 1.83 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "issue"."status_quo_schulze_rank" IS 'Schulze rank of status quo, as calculated by "calculate_ranks" function'; 1.84 + 1.85 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" ADD COLUMN "direct_majority" BOOLEAN; 1.86 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" ADD COLUMN "indirect_majority" BOOLEAN; 1.87 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" ADD COLUMN "schulze_rank" INT4; 1.88 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" ADD COLUMN "better_than_status_quo" BOOLEAN; 1.89 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" ADD COLUMN "worse_than_status_quo" BOOLEAN; 1.90 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" ADD COLUMN "reverse_beat_path" BOOLEAN; 1.91 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" ADD COLUMN "multistage_majority" BOOLEAN; 1.92 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" ADD COLUMN "eligible" BOOLEAN; 1.93 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" ADD COLUMN "winner" BOOLEAN; 1.94 + 1.95 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" DROP CONSTRAINT "non_admitted_initiatives_cant_contain_voting_results"; 1.96 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" DROP CONSTRAINT "all_or_none_of_positive_votes_negative_votes_and_agreed_must_be_null"; 1.97 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" DROP CONSTRAINT "non_agreed_initiatives_cant_get_a_rank"; 1.98 + 1.99 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" ADD CONSTRAINT "non_admitted_initiatives_cant_contain_voting_results" CHECK ( 1.100 + ( "admitted" NOTNULL AND "admitted" = TRUE ) OR 1.101 + ( "positive_votes" ISNULL AND "negative_votes" ISNULL AND 1.102 + "direct_majority" ISNULL AND "indirect_majority" ISNULL AND 1.103 + "schulze_rank" ISNULL AND 1.104 + "better_than_status_quo" ISNULL AND "worse_than_status_quo" ISNULL AND 1.105 + "reverse_beat_path" ISNULL AND "multistage_majority" ISNULL AND 1.106 + "eligible" ISNULL AND "winner" ISNULL AND "rank" ISNULL ) ); 1.107 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" ADD CONSTRAINT "better_excludes_worse" CHECK (NOT ("better_than_status_quo" AND "worse_than_status_quo")); 1.108 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" ADD CONSTRAINT "minimum_requirement_to_be_eligible" CHECK ( 1.109 + "eligible" = FALSE OR 1.110 +("direct_majority" AND "indirect_majority" AND "better_than_status_quo") ); 1.111 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" ADD CONSTRAINT "winner_must_be_eligible" CHECK ("winner"=FALSE OR "eligible"=TRUE); 1.112 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" ADD CONSTRAINT "winner_must_have_first_rank" CHECK ("winner"=FALSE OR "rank"=1); 1.113 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" ADD CONSTRAINT "eligible_at_first_rank_is_winner" CHECK ("eligible"=FALSE OR "rank"!=1 OR "winner"=TRUE); 1.114 +ALTER TABLE "initiative" ADD CONSTRAINT "unique_rank_per_issue" UNIQUE ("issue_id", "rank"); 1.115 + 1.116 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "initiative"."direct_majority" IS 'TRUE, if "positive_votes"/("positive_votes"+"negative_votes") is strictly greater or greater-equal than "direct_majority_num"/"direct_majority_den", and "positive_votes" is greater-equal than "direct_majority_positive", and ("positive_votes"+abstentions) is greater-equal than "direct_majority_non_negative"'; 1.117 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "initiative"."indirect_majority" IS 'Same as "direct_majority", but also considering indirect beat paths'; 1.118 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "initiative"."schulze_rank" IS 'Schulze-Ranking without tie-breaking'; 1.119 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "initiative"."better_than_status_quo" IS 'TRUE, if initiative has a schulze-ranking better than the status quo (without tie-breaking)'; 1.120 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "initiative"."worse_than_status_quo" IS 'TRUE, if initiative has a schulze-ranking worse than the status quo (without tie-breaking)'; 1.121 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "initiative"."reverse_beat_path" IS 'TRUE, if there is a beat path (may include ties), from this initiative to the status quo'; 1.122 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "initiative"."multistage_majority" IS 'TRUE, if either (a) this initiative has no better rank than the status quo, or (b) there exists a better ranked initiative X, which directly beats this initiative, and either more voters prefer X to this initiative than voters preferring X to the status quo or less voters prefer this initiative to X than voters preferring the status quo to X'; 1.123 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "initiative"."eligible" IS 'Initiative is "attainable" and depending on selected policy has no "reverse_beat_path" or "multistage_majority"'; 1.124 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "initiative"."winner" IS 'Winner is the "eligible" initiative with best "schulze_rank" and in case of ties with lowest "id"'; 1.125 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "initiative"."rank" IS 'Unique ranking for all "admitted" initiatives per issue; lower rank is better; a winner always has rank 1, but rank 1 does not imply that an initiative is winner; initiatives with "direct_majority" AND "indirect_majority" always have a better (lower) rank than other initiatives'; 1.126 + 1.127 +ALTER TABLE "battle" DROP CONSTRAINT "battle_pkey"; 1.128 +ALTER TABLE "battle" ALTER COLUMN "issue_id" SET NOT NULL; 1.129 +ALTER TABLE "battle" ADD CONSTRAINT "initiative_ids_not_equal" CHECK ( 1.130 + "winning_initiative_id" != "losing_initiative_id" OR 1.131 + ( ("winning_initiative_id" NOTNULL AND "losing_initiative_id" ISNULL) OR 1.132 + ("winning_initiative_id" ISNULL AND "losing_initiative_id" NOTNULL) ) ); 1.133 + 1.134 +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "battle_winning_losing_idx" ON "battle" ("issue_id", "winning_initiative_id", "losing_initiative_id"); 1.135 +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "battle_winning_null_idx" ON "battle" ("issue_id", "winning_initiative_id") WHERE "losing_initiative_id" ISNULL; 1.136 +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "battle_null_losing_idx" ON "battle" ("issue_id", "losing_initiative_id") WHERE "winning_initiative_id" ISNULL; 1.137 + 1.138 +ALTER TABLE "suggestion" ADD COLUMN "draft_id" INT8; 1.139 +-- more later 1.140 + 1.141 +ALTER TABLE "suggestion" ADD FOREIGN KEY ("initiative_id", "draft_id") REFERENCES "draft" ("initiative_id", "id") ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE CASCADE; 1.142 +ALTER TABLE "suggestion" ADD COLUMN "formatting_engine" TEXT; 1.143 +ALTER TABLE "suggestion" RENAME COLUMN "description" TO "content"; 1.144 + 1.145 +DROP TRIGGER "update_text_search_data" ON "suggestion"; 1.146 + 1.147 +CREATE TRIGGER "update_text_search_data" 1.148 + BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON "suggestion" 1.149 + FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE 1.150 + tsvector_update_trigger('text_search_data', 'pg_catalog.simple', 1.151 + "name", "content"); 1.152 + 1.153 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "suggestion"."draft_id" IS 'Draft, which the author has seen when composing the suggestion; should always be set by a frontend, but defaults to current draft of the initiative (implemented by trigger "default_for_draft_id")'; 1.154 + 1.155 +CREATE TABLE "rendered_suggestion" ( 1.156 + PRIMARY KEY ("suggestion_id", "format"), 1.157 + "suggestion_id" INT8 REFERENCES "suggestion" ("id") ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE, 1.158 + "format" TEXT, 1.159 + "content" TEXT NOT NULL ); 1.160 + 1.161 +COMMENT ON TABLE "rendered_suggestion" IS 'This table may be used by frontends to cache "rendered" drafts (e.g. HTML output generated from wiki text)'; 1.162 + 1.163 +DROP VIEW "area_member_count"; 1.164 + 1.165 +ALTER TABLE "membership" DROP COLUMN "autoreject"; 1.166 + 1.167 +ALTER TABLE "interest" DROP COLUMN "autoreject"; 1.168 +ALTER TABLE "interest" DROP COLUMN "voting_requested"; 1.169 + 1.170 +ALTER TABLE "supporter" DROP CONSTRAINT "supporter_initiative_id_fkey"; 1.171 +ALTER TABLE "supporter" ADD FOREIGN KEY ("initiative_id", "draft_id") REFERENCES "draft" ("initiative_id", "id") ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE CASCADE; 1.172 + 1.173 +COMMENT ON COLUMN "supporter"."draft_id" IS 'Latest seen draft; should always be set by a frontend, but defaults to current draft of the initiative (implemented by trigger "default_for_draft_id")'; 1.174 + 1.175 +ALTER TABLE "direct_interest_snapshot" DROP COLUMN "voting_requested"; 1.176 +ALTER TABLE "direct_voter" DROP COLUMN "autoreject"; 1.177 + 1.178 +DROP TRIGGER "default_for_draft_id" ON "supporter"; 1.179 +DROP FUNCTION "supporter_default_for_draft_id_trigger"(); 1.180 + 1.181 +CREATE FUNCTION "default_for_draft_id_trigger"() 1.182 + RETURNS TRIGGER 1.183 + LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE AS $$ 1.184 + BEGIN 1.185 + IF NEW."draft_id" ISNULL THEN 1.186 + SELECT "id" INTO NEW."draft_id" FROM "current_draft" 1.187 + WHERE "initiative_id" = NEW."initiative_id"; 1.188 + END IF; 1.189 + RETURN NEW; 1.190 + END; 1.191 + $$; 1.192 + 1.193 +CREATE TRIGGER "default_for_draft_id" BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON "suggestion" 1.194 + FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE "default_for_draft_id_trigger"(); 1.195 +CREATE TRIGGER "default_for_draft_id" BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON "supporter" 1.196 + FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE "default_for_draft_id_trigger"(); 1.197 + 1.198 +COMMENT ON FUNCTION "default_for_draft_id_trigger"() IS 'Implementation of trigger "default_for_draft" on tables "supporter" and "suggestion"'; 1.199 +COMMENT ON TRIGGER "default_for_draft_id" ON "suggestion" IS 'If "draft_id" is NULL, then use the current draft of the initiative as default'; 1.200 +COMMENT ON TRIGGER "default_for_draft_id" ON "supporter" IS 'If "draft_id" is NULL, then use the current draft of the initiative as default'; 1.201 + 1.202 +CREATE VIEW "area_member_count" AS 1.203 + SELECT 1.204 + "area"."id" AS "area_id", 1.205 + count("member"."id") AS "direct_member_count", 1.206 + coalesce( 1.207 + sum( 1.208 + CASE WHEN "member"."id" NOTNULL THEN 1.209 + "membership_weight"("area"."id", "member"."id") 1.210 + ELSE 0 END 1.211 + ) 1.212 + ) AS "member_weight" 1.213 + FROM "area" 1.214 + LEFT JOIN "membership" 1.215 + ON "area"."id" = "membership"."area_id" 1.216 + LEFT JOIN "privilege" 1.217 + ON "privilege"."unit_id" = "area"."unit_id" 1.218 + AND "privilege"."member_id" = "membership"."member_id" 1.219 + AND "privilege"."voting_right" 1.220 + LEFT JOIN "member" 1.221 + ON "member"."id" = "privilege"."member_id" -- NOTE: no membership here! 1.222 + AND "member"."active" 1.223 + GROUP BY "area"."id"; 1.224 + 1.225 +COMMENT ON VIEW "area_member_count" IS 'View used to update "direct_member_count" and "member_weight" columns of table "area"'; 1.226 + 1.227 +CREATE VIEW "battle_participant" AS 1.228 + SELECT "initiative"."id", "initiative"."issue_id" 1.229 + FROM "issue" JOIN "initiative" 1.230 + ON "issue"."id" = "initiative"."issue_id" 1.231 + WHERE "initiative"."admitted" 1.232 + UNION ALL 1.233 + SELECT NULL, "id" AS "issue_id" 1.234 + FROM "issue"; 1.235 + 1.236 +COMMENT ON VIEW "battle_participant" IS 'Helper view for "battle_view" containing admitted initiatives plus virtual "status-quo" initiative denoted by NULL reference'; 1.237 + 1.238 +CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW "battle_view" AS 1.239 + SELECT 1.240 + "issue"."id" AS "issue_id", 1.241 + "winning_initiative"."id" AS "winning_initiative_id", 1.242 + "losing_initiative"."id" AS "losing_initiative_id", 1.243 + sum( 1.244 + CASE WHEN 1.245 + coalesce("better_vote"."grade", 0) > 1.246 + coalesce("worse_vote"."grade", 0) 1.247 + THEN "direct_voter"."weight" ELSE 0 END 1.248 + ) AS "count" 1.249 + FROM "issue" 1.250 + LEFT JOIN "direct_voter" 1.251 + ON "issue"."id" = "direct_voter"."issue_id" 1.252 + JOIN "battle_participant" AS "winning_initiative" 1.253 + ON "issue"."id" = "winning_initiative"."issue_id" 1.254 + JOIN "battle_participant" AS "losing_initiative" 1.255 + ON "issue"."id" = "losing_initiative"."issue_id" 1.256 + LEFT JOIN "vote" AS "better_vote" 1.257 + ON "direct_voter"."member_id" = "better_vote"."member_id" 1.258 + AND "winning_initiative"."id" = "better_vote"."initiative_id" 1.259 + LEFT JOIN "vote" AS "worse_vote" 1.260 + ON "direct_voter"."member_id" = "worse_vote"."member_id" 1.261 + AND "losing_initiative"."id" = "worse_vote"."initiative_id" 1.262 + WHERE "issue"."closed" NOTNULL 1.263 + AND "issue"."cleaned" ISNULL 1.264 + AND ( 1.265 + "winning_initiative"."id" != "losing_initiative"."id" OR 1.266 + ( ("winning_initiative"."id" NOTNULL AND "losing_initiative"."id" ISNULL) OR 1.267 + ("winning_initiative"."id" ISNULL AND "losing_initiative"."id" NOTNULL) ) ) 1.268 + GROUP BY 1.269 + "issue"."id", 1.270 + "winning_initiative"."id", 1.271 + "losing_initiative"."id"; 1.272 + 1.273 +COMMENT ON VIEW "battle_view" IS 'Number of members preferring one initiative (or status-quo) to another initiative (or status-quo); Used to fill "battle" table'; 1.274 + 1.275 +CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "create_interest_snapshot" 1.276 + ( "issue_id_p" "issue"."id"%TYPE ) 1.277 + RETURNS VOID 1.278 + LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE AS $$ 1.279 + DECLARE 1.280 + "member_id_v" "member"."id"%TYPE; 1.281 + BEGIN 1.282 + DELETE FROM "direct_interest_snapshot" 1.283 + WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.284 + AND "event" = 'periodic'; 1.285 + DELETE FROM "delegating_interest_snapshot" 1.286 + WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.287 + AND "event" = 'periodic'; 1.288 + DELETE FROM "direct_supporter_snapshot" 1.289 + WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.290 + AND "event" = 'periodic'; 1.291 + INSERT INTO "direct_interest_snapshot" 1.292 + ("issue_id", "event", "member_id") 1.293 + SELECT 1.294 + "issue_id_p" AS "issue_id", 1.295 + 'periodic' AS "event", 1.296 + "member"."id" AS "member_id" 1.297 + FROM "issue" 1.298 + JOIN "area" ON "issue"."area_id" = "area"."id" 1.299 + JOIN "interest" ON "issue"."id" = "interest"."issue_id" 1.300 + JOIN "member" ON "interest"."member_id" = "member"."id" 1.301 + JOIN "privilege" 1.302 + ON "privilege"."unit_id" = "area"."unit_id" 1.303 + AND "privilege"."member_id" = "member"."id" 1.304 + WHERE "issue"."id" = "issue_id_p" 1.305 + AND "member"."active" AND "privilege"."voting_right"; 1.306 + FOR "member_id_v" IN 1.307 + SELECT "member_id" FROM "direct_interest_snapshot" 1.308 + WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.309 + AND "event" = 'periodic' 1.310 + LOOP 1.311 + UPDATE "direct_interest_snapshot" SET 1.312 + "weight" = 1 + 1.313 + "weight_of_added_delegations_for_interest_snapshot"( 1.314 + "issue_id_p", 1.315 + "member_id_v", 1.316 + '{}' 1.317 + ) 1.318 + WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.319 + AND "event" = 'periodic' 1.320 + AND "member_id" = "member_id_v"; 1.321 + END LOOP; 1.322 + INSERT INTO "direct_supporter_snapshot" 1.323 + ( "issue_id", "initiative_id", "event", "member_id", 1.324 + "informed", "satisfied" ) 1.325 + SELECT 1.326 + "issue_id_p" AS "issue_id", 1.327 + "initiative"."id" AS "initiative_id", 1.328 + 'periodic' AS "event", 1.329 + "supporter"."member_id" AS "member_id", 1.330 + "supporter"."draft_id" = "current_draft"."id" AS "informed", 1.331 + NOT EXISTS ( 1.332 + SELECT NULL FROM "critical_opinion" 1.333 + WHERE "initiative_id" = "initiative"."id" 1.334 + AND "member_id" = "supporter"."member_id" 1.335 + ) AS "satisfied" 1.336 + FROM "initiative" 1.337 + JOIN "supporter" 1.338 + ON "supporter"."initiative_id" = "initiative"."id" 1.339 + JOIN "current_draft" 1.340 + ON "initiative"."id" = "current_draft"."initiative_id" 1.341 + JOIN "direct_interest_snapshot" 1.342 + ON "supporter"."member_id" = "direct_interest_snapshot"."member_id" 1.343 + AND "initiative"."issue_id" = "direct_interest_snapshot"."issue_id" 1.344 + AND "event" = 'periodic' 1.345 + WHERE "initiative"."issue_id" = "issue_id_p"; 1.346 + RETURN; 1.347 + END; 1.348 + $$; 1.349 + 1.350 +CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "create_snapshot" 1.351 + ( "issue_id_p" "issue"."id"%TYPE ) 1.352 + RETURNS VOID 1.353 + LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE AS $$ 1.354 + DECLARE 1.355 + "initiative_id_v" "initiative"."id"%TYPE; 1.356 + "suggestion_id_v" "suggestion"."id"%TYPE; 1.357 + BEGIN 1.358 + PERFORM "lock_issue"("issue_id_p"); 1.359 + PERFORM "create_population_snapshot"("issue_id_p"); 1.360 + PERFORM "create_interest_snapshot"("issue_id_p"); 1.361 + UPDATE "issue" SET 1.362 + "snapshot" = now(), 1.363 + "latest_snapshot_event" = 'periodic', 1.364 + "population" = ( 1.365 + SELECT coalesce(sum("weight"), 0) 1.366 + FROM "direct_population_snapshot" 1.367 + WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.368 + AND "event" = 'periodic' 1.369 + ) 1.370 + WHERE "id" = "issue_id_p"; 1.371 + FOR "initiative_id_v" IN 1.372 + SELECT "id" FROM "initiative" WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.373 + LOOP 1.374 + UPDATE "initiative" SET 1.375 + "supporter_count" = ( 1.376 + SELECT coalesce(sum("di"."weight"), 0) 1.377 + FROM "direct_interest_snapshot" AS "di" 1.378 + JOIN "direct_supporter_snapshot" AS "ds" 1.379 + ON "di"."member_id" = "ds"."member_id" 1.380 + WHERE "di"."issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.381 + AND "di"."event" = 'periodic' 1.382 + AND "ds"."initiative_id" = "initiative_id_v" 1.383 + AND "ds"."event" = 'periodic' 1.384 + ), 1.385 + "informed_supporter_count" = ( 1.386 + SELECT coalesce(sum("di"."weight"), 0) 1.387 + FROM "direct_interest_snapshot" AS "di" 1.388 + JOIN "direct_supporter_snapshot" AS "ds" 1.389 + ON "di"."member_id" = "ds"."member_id" 1.390 + WHERE "di"."issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.391 + AND "di"."event" = 'periodic' 1.392 + AND "ds"."initiative_id" = "initiative_id_v" 1.393 + AND "ds"."event" = 'periodic' 1.394 + AND "ds"."informed" 1.395 + ), 1.396 + "satisfied_supporter_count" = ( 1.397 + SELECT coalesce(sum("di"."weight"), 0) 1.398 + FROM "direct_interest_snapshot" AS "di" 1.399 + JOIN "direct_supporter_snapshot" AS "ds" 1.400 + ON "di"."member_id" = "ds"."member_id" 1.401 + WHERE "di"."issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.402 + AND "di"."event" = 'periodic' 1.403 + AND "ds"."initiative_id" = "initiative_id_v" 1.404 + AND "ds"."event" = 'periodic' 1.405 + AND "ds"."satisfied" 1.406 + ), 1.407 + "satisfied_informed_supporter_count" = ( 1.408 + SELECT coalesce(sum("di"."weight"), 0) 1.409 + FROM "direct_interest_snapshot" AS "di" 1.410 + JOIN "direct_supporter_snapshot" AS "ds" 1.411 + ON "di"."member_id" = "ds"."member_id" 1.412 + WHERE "di"."issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.413 + AND "di"."event" = 'periodic' 1.414 + AND "ds"."initiative_id" = "initiative_id_v" 1.415 + AND "ds"."event" = 'periodic' 1.416 + AND "ds"."informed" 1.417 + AND "ds"."satisfied" 1.418 + ) 1.419 + WHERE "id" = "initiative_id_v"; 1.420 + FOR "suggestion_id_v" IN 1.421 + SELECT "id" FROM "suggestion" 1.422 + WHERE "initiative_id" = "initiative_id_v" 1.423 + LOOP 1.424 + UPDATE "suggestion" SET 1.425 + "minus2_unfulfilled_count" = ( 1.426 + SELECT coalesce(sum("snapshot"."weight"), 0) 1.427 + FROM "issue" CROSS JOIN "opinion" 1.428 + JOIN "direct_interest_snapshot" AS "snapshot" 1.429 + ON "snapshot"."issue_id" = "issue"."id" 1.430 + AND "snapshot"."event" = "issue"."latest_snapshot_event" 1.431 + AND "snapshot"."member_id" = "opinion"."member_id" 1.432 + WHERE "issue"."id" = "issue_id_p" 1.433 + AND "opinion"."suggestion_id" = "suggestion_id_v" 1.434 + AND "opinion"."degree" = -2 1.435 + AND "opinion"."fulfilled" = FALSE 1.436 + ), 1.437 + "minus2_fulfilled_count" = ( 1.438 + SELECT coalesce(sum("snapshot"."weight"), 0) 1.439 + FROM "issue" CROSS JOIN "opinion" 1.440 + JOIN "direct_interest_snapshot" AS "snapshot" 1.441 + ON "snapshot"."issue_id" = "issue"."id" 1.442 + AND "snapshot"."event" = "issue"."latest_snapshot_event" 1.443 + AND "snapshot"."member_id" = "opinion"."member_id" 1.444 + WHERE "issue"."id" = "issue_id_p" 1.445 + AND "opinion"."suggestion_id" = "suggestion_id_v" 1.446 + AND "opinion"."degree" = -2 1.447 + AND "opinion"."fulfilled" = TRUE 1.448 + ), 1.449 + "minus1_unfulfilled_count" = ( 1.450 + SELECT coalesce(sum("snapshot"."weight"), 0) 1.451 + FROM "issue" CROSS JOIN "opinion" 1.452 + JOIN "direct_interest_snapshot" AS "snapshot" 1.453 + ON "snapshot"."issue_id" = "issue"."id" 1.454 + AND "snapshot"."event" = "issue"."latest_snapshot_event" 1.455 + AND "snapshot"."member_id" = "opinion"."member_id" 1.456 + WHERE "issue"."id" = "issue_id_p" 1.457 + AND "opinion"."suggestion_id" = "suggestion_id_v" 1.458 + AND "opinion"."degree" = -1 1.459 + AND "opinion"."fulfilled" = FALSE 1.460 + ), 1.461 + "minus1_fulfilled_count" = ( 1.462 + SELECT coalesce(sum("snapshot"."weight"), 0) 1.463 + FROM "issue" CROSS JOIN "opinion" 1.464 + JOIN "direct_interest_snapshot" AS "snapshot" 1.465 + ON "snapshot"."issue_id" = "issue"."id" 1.466 + AND "snapshot"."event" = "issue"."latest_snapshot_event" 1.467 + AND "snapshot"."member_id" = "opinion"."member_id" 1.468 + WHERE "issue"."id" = "issue_id_p" 1.469 + AND "opinion"."suggestion_id" = "suggestion_id_v" 1.470 + AND "opinion"."degree" = -1 1.471 + AND "opinion"."fulfilled" = TRUE 1.472 + ), 1.473 + "plus1_unfulfilled_count" = ( 1.474 + SELECT coalesce(sum("snapshot"."weight"), 0) 1.475 + FROM "issue" CROSS JOIN "opinion" 1.476 + JOIN "direct_interest_snapshot" AS "snapshot" 1.477 + ON "snapshot"."issue_id" = "issue"."id" 1.478 + AND "snapshot"."event" = "issue"."latest_snapshot_event" 1.479 + AND "snapshot"."member_id" = "opinion"."member_id" 1.480 + WHERE "issue"."id" = "issue_id_p" 1.481 + AND "opinion"."suggestion_id" = "suggestion_id_v" 1.482 + AND "opinion"."degree" = 1 1.483 + AND "opinion"."fulfilled" = FALSE 1.484 + ), 1.485 + "plus1_fulfilled_count" = ( 1.486 + SELECT coalesce(sum("snapshot"."weight"), 0) 1.487 + FROM "issue" CROSS JOIN "opinion" 1.488 + JOIN "direct_interest_snapshot" AS "snapshot" 1.489 + ON "snapshot"."issue_id" = "issue"."id" 1.490 + AND "snapshot"."event" = "issue"."latest_snapshot_event" 1.491 + AND "snapshot"."member_id" = "opinion"."member_id" 1.492 + WHERE "issue"."id" = "issue_id_p" 1.493 + AND "opinion"."suggestion_id" = "suggestion_id_v" 1.494 + AND "opinion"."degree" = 1 1.495 + AND "opinion"."fulfilled" = TRUE 1.496 + ), 1.497 + "plus2_unfulfilled_count" = ( 1.498 + SELECT coalesce(sum("snapshot"."weight"), 0) 1.499 + FROM "issue" CROSS JOIN "opinion" 1.500 + JOIN "direct_interest_snapshot" AS "snapshot" 1.501 + ON "snapshot"."issue_id" = "issue"."id" 1.502 + AND "snapshot"."event" = "issue"."latest_snapshot_event" 1.503 + AND "snapshot"."member_id" = "opinion"."member_id" 1.504 + WHERE "issue"."id" = "issue_id_p" 1.505 + AND "opinion"."suggestion_id" = "suggestion_id_v" 1.506 + AND "opinion"."degree" = 2 1.507 + AND "opinion"."fulfilled" = FALSE 1.508 + ), 1.509 + "plus2_fulfilled_count" = ( 1.510 + SELECT coalesce(sum("snapshot"."weight"), 0) 1.511 + FROM "issue" CROSS JOIN "opinion" 1.512 + JOIN "direct_interest_snapshot" AS "snapshot" 1.513 + ON "snapshot"."issue_id" = "issue"."id" 1.514 + AND "snapshot"."event" = "issue"."latest_snapshot_event" 1.515 + AND "snapshot"."member_id" = "opinion"."member_id" 1.516 + WHERE "issue"."id" = "issue_id_p" 1.517 + AND "opinion"."suggestion_id" = "suggestion_id_v" 1.518 + AND "opinion"."degree" = 2 1.519 + AND "opinion"."fulfilled" = TRUE 1.520 + ) 1.521 + WHERE "suggestion"."id" = "suggestion_id_v"; 1.522 + END LOOP; 1.523 + END LOOP; 1.524 + RETURN; 1.525 + END; 1.526 + $$; 1.527 + 1.528 +CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "close_voting"("issue_id_p" "issue"."id"%TYPE) 1.529 + RETURNS VOID 1.530 + LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE AS $$ 1.531 + DECLARE 1.532 + "area_id_v" "area"."id"%TYPE; 1.533 + "unit_id_v" "unit"."id"%TYPE; 1.534 + "member_id_v" "member"."id"%TYPE; 1.535 + BEGIN 1.536 + PERFORM "lock_issue"("issue_id_p"); 1.537 + SELECT "area_id" INTO "area_id_v" FROM "issue" WHERE "id" = "issue_id_p"; 1.538 + SELECT "unit_id" INTO "unit_id_v" FROM "area" WHERE "id" = "area_id_v"; 1.539 + -- delete delegating votes (in cases of manual reset of issue state): 1.540 + DELETE FROM "delegating_voter" 1.541 + WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p"; 1.542 + -- delete votes from non-privileged voters: 1.543 + DELETE FROM "direct_voter" 1.544 + USING ( 1.545 + SELECT 1.546 + "direct_voter"."member_id" 1.547 + FROM "direct_voter" 1.548 + JOIN "member" ON "direct_voter"."member_id" = "member"."id" 1.549 + LEFT JOIN "privilege" 1.550 + ON "privilege"."unit_id" = "unit_id_v" 1.551 + AND "privilege"."member_id" = "direct_voter"."member_id" 1.552 + WHERE "direct_voter"."issue_id" = "issue_id_p" AND ( 1.553 + "member"."active" = FALSE OR 1.554 + "privilege"."voting_right" ISNULL OR 1.555 + "privilege"."voting_right" = FALSE 1.556 + ) 1.557 + ) AS "subquery" 1.558 + WHERE "direct_voter"."issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.559 + AND "direct_voter"."member_id" = "subquery"."member_id"; 1.560 + -- consider delegations: 1.561 + UPDATE "direct_voter" SET "weight" = 1 1.562 + WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p"; 1.563 + PERFORM "add_vote_delegations"("issue_id_p"); 1.564 + -- set voter count and mark issue as being calculated: 1.565 + UPDATE "issue" SET 1.566 + "state" = 'calculation', 1.567 + "closed" = now(), 1.568 + "voter_count" = ( 1.569 + SELECT coalesce(sum("weight"), 0) 1.570 + FROM "direct_voter" WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.571 + ) 1.572 + WHERE "id" = "issue_id_p"; 1.573 + -- materialize battle_view: 1.574 + -- NOTE: "closed" column of issue must be set at this point 1.575 + DELETE FROM "battle" WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p"; 1.576 + INSERT INTO "battle" ( 1.577 + "issue_id", 1.578 + "winning_initiative_id", "losing_initiative_id", 1.579 + "count" 1.580 + ) SELECT 1.581 + "issue_id", 1.582 + "winning_initiative_id", "losing_initiative_id", 1.583 + "count" 1.584 + FROM "battle_view" WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p"; 1.585 + -- copy "positive_votes" and "negative_votes" from "battle" table: 1.586 + UPDATE "initiative" SET 1.587 + "positive_votes" = "battle_win"."count", 1.588 + "negative_votes" = "battle_lose"."count" 1.589 + FROM "battle" AS "battle_win", "battle" AS "battle_lose" 1.590 + WHERE 1.591 + "battle_win"."issue_id" = "issue_id_p" AND 1.592 + "battle_win"."winning_initiative_id" = "initiative"."id" AND 1.593 + "battle_win"."losing_initiative_id" ISNULL AND 1.594 + "battle_lose"."issue_id" = "issue_id_p" AND 1.595 + "battle_lose"."losing_initiative_id" = "initiative"."id" AND 1.596 + "battle_lose"."winning_initiative_id" ISNULL; 1.597 + END; 1.598 + $$; 1.599 + 1.600 +DROP FUNCTION "array_init_string"(INTEGER); 1.601 +DROP FUNCTION "square_matrix_init_string"(INTEGER); 1.602 + 1.603 +CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "calculate_ranks"("issue_id_p" "issue"."id"%TYPE) 1.604 + RETURNS VOID 1.605 + LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE AS $$ 1.606 + DECLARE 1.607 + "issue_row" "issue"%ROWTYPE; 1.608 + "policy_row" "policy"%ROWTYPE; 1.609 + "dimension_v" INTEGER; 1.610 + "vote_matrix" INT4[][]; -- absolute votes 1.611 + "matrix" INT8[][]; -- defeat strength / best paths 1.612 + "i" INTEGER; 1.613 + "j" INTEGER; 1.614 + "k" INTEGER; 1.615 + "battle_row" "battle"%ROWTYPE; 1.616 + "rank_ary" INT4[]; 1.617 + "rank_v" INT4; 1.618 + "done_v" INTEGER; 1.619 + "winners_ary" INTEGER[]; 1.620 + "initiative_id_v" "initiative"."id"%TYPE; 1.621 + BEGIN 1.622 + SELECT * INTO "issue_row" 1.623 + FROM "issue" WHERE "id" = "issue_id_p" 1.624 + FOR UPDATE; 1.625 + SELECT * INTO "policy_row" 1.626 + FROM "policy" WHERE "id" = "issue_row"."policy_id"; 1.627 + SELECT count(1) INTO "dimension_v" 1.628 + FROM "battle_participant" WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p"; 1.629 + -- Create "vote_matrix" with absolute number of votes in pairwise 1.630 + -- comparison: 1.631 + "vote_matrix" := array_fill(NULL::INT4, ARRAY["dimension_v", "dimension_v"]); 1.632 + "i" := 1; 1.633 + "j" := 2; 1.634 + FOR "battle_row" IN 1.635 + SELECT * FROM "battle" WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.636 + ORDER BY 1.637 + "winning_initiative_id" NULLS LAST, 1.638 + "losing_initiative_id" NULLS LAST 1.639 + LOOP 1.640 + "vote_matrix"["i"]["j"] := "battle_row"."count"; 1.641 + IF "j" = "dimension_v" THEN 1.642 + "i" := "i" + 1; 1.643 + "j" := 1; 1.644 + ELSE 1.645 + "j" := "j" + 1; 1.646 + IF "j" = "i" THEN 1.647 + "j" := "j" + 1; 1.648 + END IF; 1.649 + END IF; 1.650 + END LOOP; 1.651 + IF "i" != "dimension_v" OR "j" != "dimension_v" + 1 THEN 1.652 + RAISE EXCEPTION 'Wrong battle count (should not happen)'; 1.653 + END IF; 1.654 + -- Store defeat strengths in "matrix" using "defeat_strength" 1.655 + -- function: 1.656 + "matrix" := array_fill(NULL::INT8, ARRAY["dimension_v", "dimension_v"]); 1.657 + "i" := 1; 1.658 + LOOP 1.659 + "j" := 1; 1.660 + LOOP 1.661 + IF "i" != "j" THEN 1.662 + "matrix"["i"]["j"] := "defeat_strength"( 1.663 + "vote_matrix"["i"]["j"], 1.664 + "vote_matrix"["j"]["i"] 1.665 + ); 1.666 + END IF; 1.667 + EXIT WHEN "j" = "dimension_v"; 1.668 + "j" := "j" + 1; 1.669 + END LOOP; 1.670 + EXIT WHEN "i" = "dimension_v"; 1.671 + "i" := "i" + 1; 1.672 + END LOOP; 1.673 + -- Find best paths: 1.674 + "i" := 1; 1.675 + LOOP 1.676 + "j" := 1; 1.677 + LOOP 1.678 + IF "i" != "j" THEN 1.679 + "k" := 1; 1.680 + LOOP 1.681 + IF "i" != "k" AND "j" != "k" THEN 1.682 + IF "matrix"["j"]["i"] < "matrix"["i"]["k"] THEN 1.683 + IF "matrix"["j"]["i"] > "matrix"["j"]["k"] THEN 1.684 + "matrix"["j"]["k"] := "matrix"["j"]["i"]; 1.685 + END IF; 1.686 + ELSE 1.687 + IF "matrix"["i"]["k"] > "matrix"["j"]["k"] THEN 1.688 + "matrix"["j"]["k"] := "matrix"["i"]["k"]; 1.689 + END IF; 1.690 + END IF; 1.691 + END IF; 1.692 + EXIT WHEN "k" = "dimension_v"; 1.693 + "k" := "k" + 1; 1.694 + END LOOP; 1.695 + END IF; 1.696 + EXIT WHEN "j" = "dimension_v"; 1.697 + "j" := "j" + 1; 1.698 + END LOOP; 1.699 + EXIT WHEN "i" = "dimension_v"; 1.700 + "i" := "i" + 1; 1.701 + END LOOP; 1.702 + -- Determine order of winners: 1.703 + "rank_ary" := array_fill(NULL::INT4, ARRAY["dimension_v"]); 1.704 + "rank_v" := 1; 1.705 + "done_v" := 0; 1.706 + LOOP 1.707 + "winners_ary" := '{}'; 1.708 + "i" := 1; 1.709 + LOOP 1.710 + IF "rank_ary"["i"] ISNULL THEN 1.711 + "j" := 1; 1.712 + LOOP 1.713 + IF 1.714 + "i" != "j" AND 1.715 + "rank_ary"["j"] ISNULL AND 1.716 + "matrix"["j"]["i"] > "matrix"["i"]["j"] 1.717 + THEN 1.718 + -- someone else is better 1.719 + EXIT; 1.720 + END IF; 1.721 + IF "j" = "dimension_v" THEN 1.722 + -- noone is better 1.723 + "winners_ary" := "winners_ary" || "i"; 1.724 + EXIT; 1.725 + END IF; 1.726 + "j" := "j" + 1; 1.727 + END LOOP; 1.728 + END IF; 1.729 + EXIT WHEN "i" = "dimension_v"; 1.730 + "i" := "i" + 1; 1.731 + END LOOP; 1.732 + "i" := 1; 1.733 + LOOP 1.734 + "rank_ary"["winners_ary"["i"]] := "rank_v"; 1.735 + "done_v" := "done_v" + 1; 1.736 + EXIT WHEN "i" = array_upper("winners_ary", 1); 1.737 + "i" := "i" + 1; 1.738 + END LOOP; 1.739 + EXIT WHEN "done_v" = "dimension_v"; 1.740 + "rank_v" := "rank_v" + 1; 1.741 + END LOOP; 1.742 + -- write preliminary results: 1.743 + "i" := 1; 1.744 + FOR "initiative_id_v" IN 1.745 + SELECT "id" FROM "initiative" 1.746 + WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p" AND "admitted" 1.747 + ORDER BY "id" 1.748 + LOOP 1.749 + UPDATE "initiative" SET 1.750 + "direct_majority" = 1.751 + CASE WHEN "policy_row"."direct_majority_strict" THEN 1.752 + "positive_votes" * "policy_row"."direct_majority_den" > 1.753 + "policy_row"."direct_majority_num" * ("positive_votes"+"negative_votes") 1.754 + ELSE 1.755 + "positive_votes" * "policy_row"."direct_majority_den" >= 1.756 + "policy_row"."direct_majority_num" * ("positive_votes"+"negative_votes") 1.757 + END 1.758 + AND "positive_votes" >= "policy_row"."direct_majority_positive" 1.759 + AND "issue_row"."voter_count"-"negative_votes" >= 1.760 + "policy_row"."direct_majority_non_negative", 1.761 + "indirect_majority" = 1.762 + CASE WHEN "policy_row"."indirect_majority_strict" THEN 1.763 + "positive_votes" * "policy_row"."indirect_majority_den" > 1.764 + "policy_row"."indirect_majority_num" * ("positive_votes"+"negative_votes") 1.765 + ELSE 1.766 + "positive_votes" * "policy_row"."indirect_majority_den" >= 1.767 + "policy_row"."indirect_majority_num" * ("positive_votes"+"negative_votes") 1.768 + END 1.769 + AND "positive_votes" >= "policy_row"."indirect_majority_positive" 1.770 + AND "issue_row"."voter_count"-"negative_votes" >= 1.771 + "policy_row"."indirect_majority_non_negative", 1.772 + "schulze_rank" = "rank_ary"["i"], 1.773 + "better_than_status_quo" = "rank_ary"["i"] < "rank_ary"["dimension_v"], 1.774 + "worse_than_status_quo" = "rank_ary"["i"] > "rank_ary"["dimension_v"], 1.775 + "multistage_majority" = "rank_ary"["i"] >= "rank_ary"["dimension_v"], 1.776 + "reverse_beat_path" = "matrix"["dimension_v"]["i"] >= 0, 1.777 + "winner" = FALSE 1.778 + WHERE "id" = "initiative_id_v"; 1.779 + "i" := "i" + 1; 1.780 + END LOOP; 1.781 + IF "i" != "dimension_v" THEN 1.782 + RAISE EXCEPTION 'Wrong winner count (should not happen)'; 1.783 + END IF; 1.784 + -- take indirect majorities into account: 1.785 + LOOP 1.786 + UPDATE "initiative" SET "indirect_majority" = TRUE 1.787 + FROM ( 1.788 + SELECT "new_initiative"."id" AS "initiative_id" 1.789 + FROM "initiative" "old_initiative" 1.790 + JOIN "initiative" "new_initiative" 1.791 + ON "new_initiative"."issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.792 + AND "new_initiative"."indirect_majority" = FALSE 1.793 + JOIN "battle" "battle_win" 1.794 + ON "battle_win"."issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.795 + AND "battle_win"."winning_initiative_id" = "new_initiative"."id" 1.796 + AND "battle_win"."losing_initiative_id" = "old_initiative"."id" 1.797 + JOIN "battle" "battle_lose" 1.798 + ON "battle_lose"."issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.799 + AND "battle_lose"."losing_initiative_id" = "new_initiative"."id" 1.800 + AND "battle_lose"."winning_initiative_id" = "old_initiative"."id" 1.801 + WHERE "old_initiative"."issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.802 + AND "old_initiative"."indirect_majority" = TRUE 1.803 + AND CASE WHEN "policy_row"."indirect_majority_strict" THEN 1.804 + "battle_win"."count" * "policy_row"."indirect_majority_den" > 1.805 + "policy_row"."indirect_majority_num" * 1.806 + ("battle_win"."count"+"battle_lose"."count") 1.807 + ELSE 1.808 + "battle_win"."count" * "policy_row"."indirect_majority_den" >= 1.809 + "policy_row"."indirect_majority_num" * 1.810 + ("battle_win"."count"+"battle_lose"."count") 1.811 + END 1.812 + AND "battle_win"."count" >= "policy_row"."indirect_majority_positive" 1.813 + AND "issue_row"."voter_count"-"battle_lose"."count" >= 1.814 + "policy_row"."indirect_majority_non_negative" 1.815 + ) AS "subquery" 1.816 + WHERE "id" = "subquery"."initiative_id"; 1.817 + EXIT WHEN NOT FOUND; 1.818 + END LOOP; 1.819 + -- set "multistage_majority" for remaining matching initiatives: 1.820 + UPDATE "initiative" SET "multistage_majority" = TRUE 1.821 + FROM ( 1.822 + SELECT "losing_initiative"."id" AS "initiative_id" 1.823 + FROM "initiative" "losing_initiative" 1.824 + JOIN "initiative" "winning_initiative" 1.825 + ON "winning_initiative"."issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.826 + AND "winning_initiative"."admitted" 1.827 + JOIN "battle" "battle_win" 1.828 + ON "battle_win"."issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.829 + AND "battle_win"."winning_initiative_id" = "winning_initiative"."id" 1.830 + AND "battle_win"."losing_initiative_id" = "losing_initiative"."id" 1.831 + JOIN "battle" "battle_lose" 1.832 + ON "battle_lose"."issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.833 + AND "battle_lose"."losing_initiative_id" = "winning_initiative"."id" 1.834 + AND "battle_lose"."winning_initiative_id" = "losing_initiative"."id" 1.835 + WHERE "losing_initiative"."issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.836 + AND "losing_initiative"."admitted" 1.837 + AND "winning_initiative"."schulze_rank" < 1.838 + "losing_initiative"."schulze_rank" 1.839 + AND "battle_win"."count" > "battle_lose"."count" 1.840 + AND ( 1.841 + "battle_win"."count" > "winning_initiative"."positive_votes" OR 1.842 + "battle_lose"."count" < "losing_initiative"."negative_votes" ) 1.843 + ) AS "subquery" 1.844 + WHERE "id" = "subquery"."initiative_id"; 1.845 + -- mark eligible initiatives: 1.846 + UPDATE "initiative" SET "eligible" = TRUE 1.847 + WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.848 + AND "initiative"."direct_majority" 1.849 + AND "initiative"."indirect_majority" 1.850 + AND "initiative"."better_than_status_quo" 1.851 + AND ( 1.852 + "policy_row"."no_multistage_majority" = FALSE OR 1.853 + "initiative"."multistage_majority" = FALSE ) 1.854 + AND ( 1.855 + "policy_row"."no_reverse_beat_path" = FALSE OR 1.856 + "initiative"."reverse_beat_path" = FALSE ); 1.857 + -- mark final winner: 1.858 + UPDATE "initiative" SET "winner" = TRUE 1.859 + FROM ( 1.860 + SELECT "id" AS "initiative_id" 1.861 + FROM "initiative" 1.862 + WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p" AND "eligible" 1.863 + ORDER BY "schulze_rank", "id" 1.864 + LIMIT 1 1.865 + ) AS "subquery" 1.866 + WHERE "id" = "subquery"."initiative_id"; 1.867 + -- write (final) ranks: 1.868 + "rank_v" := 1; 1.869 + FOR "initiative_id_v" IN 1.870 + SELECT "id" 1.871 + FROM "initiative" 1.872 + WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p" AND "admitted" 1.873 + ORDER BY 1.874 + "winner" DESC, 1.875 + ("direct_majority" AND "indirect_majority") DESC, 1.876 + "schulze_rank", 1.877 + "id" 1.878 + LOOP 1.879 + UPDATE "initiative" SET "rank" = "rank_v" 1.880 + WHERE "id" = "initiative_id_v"; 1.881 + "rank_v" := "rank_v" + 1; 1.882 + END LOOP; 1.883 + -- set schulze rank of status quo and mark issue as finished: 1.884 + UPDATE "issue" SET 1.885 + "status_quo_schulze_rank" = "rank_ary"["dimension_v"], 1.886 + "state" = 1.887 + CASE WHEN EXISTS ( 1.888 + SELECT NULL FROM "initiative" 1.889 + WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p" AND "winner" 1.890 + ) THEN 1.891 + 'finished_with_winner'::"issue_state" 1.892 + ELSE 1.893 + 'finished_without_winner'::"issue_state" 1.894 + END, 1.895 + "ranks_available" = TRUE 1.896 + WHERE "id" = "issue_id_p"; 1.897 + RETURN; 1.898 + END; 1.899 + $$; 1.900 + 1.901 +CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "check_issue" 1.902 + ( "issue_id_p" "issue"."id"%TYPE ) 1.903 + RETURNS VOID 1.904 + LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE AS $$ 1.905 + DECLARE 1.906 + "issue_row" "issue"%ROWTYPE; 1.907 + "policy_row" "policy"%ROWTYPE; 1.908 + BEGIN 1.909 + PERFORM "lock_issue"("issue_id_p"); 1.910 + SELECT * INTO "issue_row" FROM "issue" WHERE "id" = "issue_id_p"; 1.911 + -- only process open issues: 1.912 + IF "issue_row"."closed" ISNULL THEN 1.913 + SELECT * INTO "policy_row" FROM "policy" 1.914 + WHERE "id" = "issue_row"."policy_id"; 1.915 + -- create a snapshot, unless issue is already fully frozen: 1.916 + IF "issue_row"."fully_frozen" ISNULL THEN 1.917 + PERFORM "create_snapshot"("issue_id_p"); 1.918 + SELECT * INTO "issue_row" FROM "issue" WHERE "id" = "issue_id_p"; 1.919 + END IF; 1.920 + -- eventually close or accept issues, which have not been accepted: 1.921 + IF "issue_row"."accepted" ISNULL THEN 1.922 + IF EXISTS ( 1.923 + SELECT NULL FROM "initiative" 1.924 + WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.925 + AND "supporter_count" > 0 1.926 + AND "supporter_count" * "policy_row"."issue_quorum_den" 1.927 + >= "issue_row"."population" * "policy_row"."issue_quorum_num" 1.928 + ) THEN 1.929 + -- accept issues, if supporter count is high enough 1.930 + PERFORM "set_snapshot_event"("issue_id_p", 'end_of_admission'); 1.931 + -- NOTE: "issue_row" used later 1.932 + "issue_row"."state" := 'discussion'; 1.933 + "issue_row"."accepted" := now(); 1.934 + UPDATE "issue" SET 1.935 + "state" = "issue_row"."state", 1.936 + "accepted" = "issue_row"."accepted" 1.937 + WHERE "id" = "issue_row"."id"; 1.938 + ELSIF 1.939 + now() >= "issue_row"."created" + "issue_row"."admission_time" 1.940 + THEN 1.941 + -- close issues, if admission time has expired 1.942 + PERFORM "set_snapshot_event"("issue_id_p", 'end_of_admission'); 1.943 + UPDATE "issue" SET 1.944 + "state" = 'canceled_issue_not_accepted', 1.945 + "closed" = now() 1.946 + WHERE "id" = "issue_row"."id"; 1.947 + END IF; 1.948 + END IF; 1.949 + -- eventually half freeze issues: 1.950 + IF 1.951 + -- NOTE: issue can't be closed at this point, if it has been accepted 1.952 + "issue_row"."accepted" NOTNULL AND 1.953 + "issue_row"."half_frozen" ISNULL 1.954 + THEN 1.955 + IF 1.956 + now() >= "issue_row"."accepted" + "issue_row"."discussion_time" 1.957 + THEN 1.958 + PERFORM "set_snapshot_event"("issue_id_p", 'half_freeze'); 1.959 + -- NOTE: "issue_row" used later 1.960 + "issue_row"."state" := 'verification'; 1.961 + "issue_row"."half_frozen" := now(); 1.962 + UPDATE "issue" SET 1.963 + "state" = "issue_row"."state", 1.964 + "half_frozen" = "issue_row"."half_frozen" 1.965 + WHERE "id" = "issue_row"."id"; 1.966 + END IF; 1.967 + END IF; 1.968 + -- close issues after some time, if all initiatives have been revoked: 1.969 + IF 1.970 + "issue_row"."closed" ISNULL AND 1.971 + NOT EXISTS ( 1.972 + -- all initiatives are revoked 1.973 + SELECT NULL FROM "initiative" 1.974 + WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p" AND "revoked" ISNULL 1.975 + ) AND ( 1.976 + -- and issue has not been accepted yet 1.977 + "issue_row"."accepted" ISNULL OR 1.978 + NOT EXISTS ( 1.979 + -- or no initiatives have been revoked lately 1.980 + SELECT NULL FROM "initiative" 1.981 + WHERE "issue_id" = "issue_id_p" 1.982 + AND now() < "revoked" + "issue_row"."verification_time" 1.983 + ) OR ( 1.984 + -- or verification time has elapsed 1.985 + "issue_row"."half_frozen" NOTNULL AND 1.986 + "issue_row"."fully_frozen" ISNULL AND 1.987 + now() >= "issue_row"."half_frozen" + "issue_row"."verification_time" 1.988 + ) 1.989 + ) 1.990 + THEN 1.991 + -- NOTE: "issue_row" used later 1.992 + IF "issue_row"."accepted" ISNULL THEN 1.993 + "issue_row"."state" := 'canceled_revoked_before_accepted'; 1.994 + ELSIF "issue_row"."half_frozen" ISNULL THEN 1.995 + "issue_row"."state" := 'canceled_after_revocation_during_discussion'; 1.996 + ELSE 1.997 + "issue_row"."state" := 'canceled_after_revocation_during_verification'; 1.998 + END IF; 1.999 + "issue_row"."closed" := now(); 1.1000 + UPDATE "issue" SET 1.1001 + "state" = "issue_row"."state", 1.1002 + "closed" = "issue_row"."closed" 1.1003 + WHERE "id" = "issue_row"."id"; 1.1004 + END IF; 1.1005 + -- fully freeze issue after verification time: 1.1006 + IF 1.1007 + "issue_row"."half_frozen" NOTNULL AND 1.1008 + "issue_row"."fully_frozen" ISNULL AND 1.1009 + "issue_row"."closed" ISNULL AND 1.1010 + now() >= "issue_row"."half_frozen" + "issue_row"."verification_time" 1.1011 + THEN 1.1012 + PERFORM "freeze_after_snapshot"("issue_id_p"); 1.1013 + -- NOTE: "issue" might change, thus "issue_row" has to be updated below 1.1014 + END IF; 1.1015 + SELECT * INTO "issue_row" FROM "issue" WHERE "id" = "issue_id_p"; 1.1016 + -- close issue by calling close_voting(...) after voting time: 1.1017 + IF 1.1018 + "issue_row"."closed" ISNULL AND 1.1019 + "issue_row"."fully_frozen" NOTNULL AND 1.1020 + now() >= "issue_row"."fully_frozen" + "issue_row"."voting_time" 1.1021 + THEN 1.1022 + PERFORM "close_voting"("issue_id_p"); 1.1023 + -- calculate ranks will not consume much time and can be done now 1.1024 + PERFORM "calculate_ranks"("issue_id_p"); 1.1025 + END IF; 1.1026 + END IF; 1.1027 + RETURN; 1.1028 + END; 1.1029 + $$; 1.1030 + 1.1031 +-- TODO: recalculate voting results 1.1032 + 1.1033 +COMMIT; 1.1034 + 1.1035 +UPDATE "suggestion" SET "draft_id" = "subquery"."draft_id" 1.1036 + FROM ( 1.1037 + SELECT DISTINCT ON ("suggestion"."id") 1.1038 + "suggestion"."id" AS "suggestion_id", 1.1039 + "draft"."id" AS "draft_id" 1.1040 + FROM "suggestion" JOIN "draft" 1.1041 + ON "suggestion"."initiative_id" = "draft"."initiative_id" 1.1042 + WHERE "draft"."created" <= "suggestion"."created" 1.1043 + ORDER BY "suggestion"."id", "draft"."created" DESC 1.1044 + ) AS "subquery" 1.1045 + WHERE "suggestion"."id" = "subquery"."suggestion_id"; 1.1046 + 1.1047 +ALTER TABLE "suggestion" ALTER COLUMN "draft_id" SET NOT NULL;