liquid_feedback_frontend
view locale/help/initiative.show.en.txt @ 75:733f65c0c0a0
Bugfixes, feature enhancements, code-cleanup, and major work on API
Details:
- API
-- Allow relation name to be passed to helper function util.autoapi{...}
-- Added area API
-- Bugfixes in API
--- Correctly return initiatives (bug #162)
--- Correctly process "id" parameter for initiative API
--- Bugfix related to "state" parameter (bug #165)
--- Changed constant "discussion" to "accepted" (in model/issue.lua, used by API)
--- Fixed JSON encoding in auto_api (bug #181)
--- Ignore list filter "voted" in case of public access
--- Enable access to API without session
- Work on RSS feed (incomplete yet)
- Other bugfixes
-- Handle empty browser identification string
-- Handle invalid date in member/update.lua (bugs #24 #109 #115 #136)
-- Better handle errors while converting uploaded images. (bug #79 +5 duplicates)
-- Don't display revoked initiatives in list of new drafts (bug #134)
-- Fixed syntax error in app/main/member/_action/update_name.lua throwing unexpected error, when new name was too short
-- Do not display refresh support button for revoked initiatives
-- Repaired issue search (bug #150)
-- Fixed typos in german translation files
--- "initi(i)erte"
--- "Er(g)eignisse" (bug #161)
- Code cleanup
-- Removed deprecated motd files locale/motd/de.txt and locale/motd/de_public.txt
-- Removed redundant code in app/main/index/_updated_drafts.lua
- New features and (optical) enhancements
-- Support change of notify email; notification of not approved address added to start page
-- Settings dialog splitted into single pages
-- Mark deactivated members
-- Calendar for birthday selection in profile
-- Policy list public readable when public access is enabled
Details:
- API
-- Allow relation name to be passed to helper function util.autoapi{...}
-- Added area API
-- Bugfixes in API
--- Correctly return initiatives (bug #162)
--- Correctly process "id" parameter for initiative API
--- Bugfix related to "state" parameter (bug #165)
--- Changed constant "discussion" to "accepted" (in model/issue.lua, used by API)
--- Fixed JSON encoding in auto_api (bug #181)
--- Ignore list filter "voted" in case of public access
--- Enable access to API without session
- Work on RSS feed (incomplete yet)
- Other bugfixes
-- Handle empty browser identification string
-- Handle invalid date in member/update.lua (bugs #24 #109 #115 #136)
-- Better handle errors while converting uploaded images. (bug #79 +5 duplicates)
-- Don't display revoked initiatives in list of new drafts (bug #134)
-- Fixed syntax error in app/main/member/_action/update_name.lua throwing unexpected error, when new name was too short
-- Do not display refresh support button for revoked initiatives
-- Repaired issue search (bug #150)
-- Fixed typos in german translation files
--- "initi(i)erte"
--- "Er(g)eignisse" (bug #161)
- Code cleanup
-- Removed deprecated motd files locale/motd/de.txt and locale/motd/de_public.txt
-- Removed redundant code in app/main/index/_updated_drafts.lua
- New features and (optical) enhancements
-- Support change of notify email; notification of not approved address added to start page
-- Settings dialog splitted into single pages
-- Mark deactivated members
-- Calendar for birthday selection in profile
-- Policy list public readable when public access is enabled
| author | bsw |
|---|---|
| date | Thu Jul 08 18:44:02 2010 +0200 (2010-07-08) |
| parents | 1d08cf5dca3d |
| children |
line source
1 =Initiative, support, suggestion=
2 During the discussion phase you can support this initiative giving the initiators important feed-back about the approval level of the current draft. Apart from that you can communicate via suggestions (for making changes), what can still be improved, or indicate conditions under which you can imagine to give your support.
4 You can follow suggestions of other members (thereby increasing the weight of these suggestions) and come up with your own (additional) suggestions. You can mark suggestions that you believe to be mandatory changes from your point of view, for you to approve with ,,must'', and nice-to-have ones with ,,should''. You can also be skeptical of suggestions and mark them with ,,should not''. You can mark a suggestion that, if realized, would lead you to disapprove, with ,,must not''.
5 =revised draft, realization notes=
6 Based on the (classified and quantified) suggestions the initiators decide what to present better, add or change in a new draft. The improved draft will be submitted to the supporters to ask for confirmation. Supporters can mark suggestions as implemented, if from their point of view the suggestions has been (sufficiently) implemented. Individual supporters can judge this quite differently.
7 =invite further initiators, revoke an initiative=
8 An initiator can invite further initiators thereby granting them equal rights on editing the draft. Every initiator of an initiative can revoke the initiative and recommend another alternative initiative to the supporters on request.
9 =if you don't get heard=
10 If the initiators, for inexplicable reasons, do not consider your suggestion, you can, of course, start your own initiative anytime.
11 =if you disapprove this initiative=
12 If you disapprove this initiative fundamentally, you should do nothing at all on this page, but support the initiative(s), that you are positive about, and/or start your own initiative related to this issue. If you are not already a member of the area you can increase the population of the necessary support quorum by becoming a member of the area or by adding your interest to the issue. You can achieve the same effect by delegating to a member of the area or a member interested at the issue. **Only for state ,,New'':** If the issue of this initiative is still in the state ,,New'' and, in fact, you do not want to discuss this issue at all, you should first only become a member of the area or add interest to the issue, but not give any suggestions, making you a (potential) supporter. Also, you should not yet start a counter initiative, which might raise the issue above the minimum admission level.